It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition

A recent article by Graham Stone (Jisc) and Kai Geschuhn (MPDL) published in the British library journal UKSG Insights highlights the outcomes of two workshops organized by the Efficiencies and Standards for Article Charges initiative (ESAC) in 2016 und 2017.

The paper makes the case for stronger engagement of libraries and consortia when it comes to negotiating and drafting offsetting agreements. The workshops have shown a clear need for an improvement of the current workflows and processes between academic institutions (and libraries) and the publishers they use in terms of author identification, metadata exchange and invoicing. Publishers need to invest in their editorial systems, while institutions need to get a clearer understanding of the strategic goal of offsetting. To this purpose, strategic and practical elements, which should be included in the agreements, were introduced. The paper proposes a set of recommendations for article workflows and services between institutions and publishers, based on a draft document which was produced as part of the 2nd ESAC Offsetting Workshop in March 2017. These recommendations should be seen as a minimum set of practical and formal requirements for offsetting agreements and are necessary to make any publication-based open access business model work.

Read the full article

University of Oldenburg updates its APC expenditures

The Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg has updated its APC expenditures. The lastest contribution provides additional data for the 2017 period.

The BIS (Library and Information System) is in charge of the University’s Open Access Publishing Fund, which is supported under the DFG’s Open Access Publishing Programme.

Contact person is Kim Braun.

Cost data

The new dataset covers publication fees for 23 articles. Total expenditure amounts to 30 544€ and the average fee is 1 328€.

The following table shows the payments the BIS has made to publishers since Oldenburg’s last report.

  Articles Fees paid in EURO Mean Fee paid
Frontiers Media SA 9 14283 1587
Copernicus GmbH 3 1562 521
Springer Nature 2 2703 1352
BMJ 1 1509 1509
Informa UK Limited 1 1364 1364
Ivyspring International Publisher 1 1494 1494
MDPI AG 1 1314 1314
OMICS Publishing Group 1 1893 1893
Optical Society of America (OSA) 1 1773 1773
PAGEPress Publications 1 714 714
Public Library of Science (PLoS) 1 1305 1305
SAGE Publications 1 629 629

Overview

With the recent contribution included, the overall APC data for the University of Oldenburg now looks as follows:

Fees paid per publisher (in EURO)

plot of chunk tree_oldenburg_2017_09_29_full

Average costs per year (in EURO)

plot of chunk box_oldenburg_2017_09_29_year_full

Average costs per publisher (in EURO)

plot of chunk box_oldenburg_2017_09_29_publisher_full

University of Barcelona reports its 2016 APC expenditures

The Universitat de Barcelona has updated its APC expenditures, the latest contribution provides data for the 2016 period.

Contact person is Ignasi Labastida i Juan.

Cost data

The new dataset covers publication fees for 88 articles. Total expenditure amounts to 95 428€ and the average fee is 1 084€.

The following table shows the payments the University of Barcelona has made to publishers in 2016.

  Articles Fees paid in EURO Mean Fee paid
Springer Nature 26 27785 1069
Public Library of Science (PLoS) 18 16122 896
Frontiers Media SA 10 12168 1217
Impact Journals, LLC 6 8714 1452
Hindawi Publishing Corporation 5 5639 1128
MDPI AG 4 3738 935
Oxford University Press (OUP) 4 6378 1594
Wiley-Blackwell 3 4244 1415
IOP Publishing 2 3120 1560
Academic Journals 1 520 520
BMJ 1 189 189
Canadian Center of Science and Education 1 368 368
Copernicus GmbH 1 955 955
HAU, Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 1000 1000
Japan Epidemiological Association 1 302 302
JMIR Publications Inc. 1 2000 2000
Optical Society of America (OSA) 1 690 690
PeerJ 1 657 657
Regional Euro-Asian Biological Invasions Centre Oy (REABIC) 1 840 840

Overview

With the recent contribution included, the overall APC data for Barcelona now looks as follows:

Fees paid per publisher (in EURO)

plot of chunk tree_barcelona_2017_09_25_full

Average costs per year (in EURO)

plot of chunk box_barcelona_2017_09_25_year_full

Average costs per publisher (in EURO)

plot of chunk box_barcelona_2017_09_25_publisher_full